
I’ve talked a lot about abstract art but art has to be appreciated (or despised) by its presence before your eyes…



Not all these are abstracts, can you identify which is what?
CHEERS
Faith saved us from the savages that we were, losing faith makes us savages again

I’ve talked a lot about abstract art but art has to be appreciated (or despised) by its presence before your eyes…



Not all these are abstracts, can you identify which is what?
CHEERS
💙🧡❤️
Me gustaLe gusta a 1 persona
🙏🌺🙏🌻🙏🌼
Me gustaMe gusta
La creencia
que en el inconsciente
la luz de la verdad
arde en cada persona
nos separa de otras personas
que se han hecho a sí mismos Dios
Me gustaLe gusta a 1 persona
Creo que tienes razón. Muchas gracias y un saludo de España.
Me gustaLe gusta a 1 persona
Abstract art is rarely repulsive on its own. When the artist produces work historically less than the worst effort of a pre-schooler’s finger painting, the label «junk» is appropriate, especially when that artist is known to be socially repulsive – attention-seeking, mercenary, yadda, yadda, and their output slap-dash. Your usual fine post, this morning (afternoon).
I’m going with all abstract except the representation of the woman.
Me gustaLe gusta a 2 personas
Thank you Espie, I agree with your statement, for sure. Abstract art has to be quite interesting to be mediocre… Reference the question, no, the abstracts are the featured image and the one with many vertical lines, the other two are figurative. I appreciate it and all the best.
Me gustaLe gusta a 1 persona
Beautiful
Me gustaLe gusta a 1 persona