#art, The «Timeless Circle of Masters» and You…

(«Medieval Jazz No. 2″/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved)

THE TIMELESS CIRCLE OF MASTERS
(of art)

Usually most people think of the great masters of the Renaissance when asked about their favourite artist. Others look more to the recent past or even to the present. But knowledge of art history is very sketchy among most people and even among many artists who have not gained from the vast amount of knowledge that art history contains. So, the solution is to study art history?

Well, yes, but no, not necessarily. You can subscribe to my blog and to my YouTube channel (www.YouTube.com/@FranciscoBravo Cabrera) and I think you will learn enough. That is if you are simply a lover of art. But if you are, or aspire to be, an artist, then you should study art history, as well as painting, drawing and other techniques. Education and preparation is essential for an artist.

So, let us look at what I am calling the “timeless circle of masters.” These are greats that not many dispute their inclusion in such a special group:

Leonardo da Vinci – mindful, experimental, the searcher
Michelangelo – impetuous, powerful, indefatigable worker, mystic
Rembrandt van Rijn – light and human truth.
Diego Velázquez – visionary, technical perfection, spiritual quest
Johannes Vermeer – seeking the light and its impact on the world and people
Francisco de Goya – painter of reason, nightmare and social criticism
Claude Monet – the birth of perception as art.
Vincent van Gogh – emotion as flame and colour as the medium
Pablo Picasso – inventing new ways to create, innovations, the search without end

I would say, unequivocally, that all of these, (whether I like them or not), redefined the meaning of a painting, or what painting was before them. They did not only work through their good taste and the search for beauty but of art being.

Here are some more that some art historians would probably add to the above “super” group:

Caravaggio – light, darkness, and violence turned into revelation
Frida Kahlo – capitalising on being a “martyr”
Sandro Botticelli – a true maser of light, colour, image and greatness
Salvador Dalí – self-agrandising, narcissist, non-genius who called himself a genius

And although these painters are now famous, some of them were not famous in their time, although some, like Velázquez and Goya excelled in the courts of kings and Michelangelo was commissioned by popes to decorate churches…

Some would say, and I would agree, that fame is only the faintest reflection of what truly matters in art…

Most of the “greats” did not live to chase recognition. On the contrary, their search, their quest was for truth, light, and the feeling of art, and used a canvas, or a wall, to find themselves within that search. Painting is seeing, and one must see with honesty and if you accomplish that, then you will walk the same path of the great ones even if only a few people know your name, or no one at all. As an artist you add colour to the world and things that did not exist before you picked up a brush, dipped it in paint and placed it on a surface. And that is no small thing. It is a search and it is the expression of what you found.

I have heard it say that, «Art is the quiet echo of the soul made visible. It asks nothing but attention, and in return, it teaches us how to see ourselves and the world anew.» I can subscribe to this statement only if I can add that art is also an academic/professional pursuit which demands of the student/artist education, preparation, discipline and good taste. And also the hunger to exhibit, sell and live off of his art. Art, can also, like a soft brushstroke across still water, stay with you if you let it…

So you, yes, you, what are you chasing in art?

CHEERS

#opinion, Pero… ¿Es que vivimos en un mundo infantil? We Live in a Childish World Now?

(«Pablo Genio»/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/Derechos Reservados)

En primer lugar vamos a colocarnos en un punto neutro, sin juzgar. Pablo Picasso nació en 1881, o sea, en el Siglo XIX, y vivió gran parte del S. XX, pues murió en 1973. ¿Entendéis? No es producto de estos tiempos gobernados por los que quieren que todo sea «correcto políticamente» o «políticamente correcto» y otras chorradas. Que era un maltratador y abusador, bueno, quizás, pero ninguna de sus mujeres (supuestas víctimas) alguna vez se quejaron de maltratos. Al contrario, a todas las mantenía muy bien y ninguna, salvo Françoise Gilot, quiso separarse jamás de él Asi que querer ahora desprestigiar a un artista muerto, a un artista considerado el genio del Siglo XX, creador del cubismo, del collage y de la pintura libre de las tantas restricciones que existían, es la cosa mas ridícula, aún entre las tantas ridiculeces de estos tiempos. Que casualidad que en ninguna otra época, ni el los 60, ni en los 70, 80, 90, 2000, a nadie se le ocurrió salir a decir que hay que echar a Picasso a un lado porque maltrato a sus mujeres. Vaya estupidez tan ruin de los que suelen marcar las pautas de esta época neo-puritana y dictatorial. Estos buscan imponer una moral estricta, extrema y rígida. Lo único que les falta es resucitar la Santa Inquisición, pero esta vez en lugar de ser santa seria feminista para impone la rectitud ideológica y el afán por cancelar al que no entre por el aro. Y ahora hasta los pintores y artistas han caído en su censura. Vaya mierda de praxis…

+++

First of all, let’s position ourselves at a neutral point, without judgment. Pablo Picasso was born in 1881, that is, in the 19th century, and lived most of the 20th century, as he died in 1973. Do you understand? He is not a product of these times governed by those who want everything to be «politically correct» or «correct politically» and other nonsense. Was he an abuser and a mistreater? Well, perhaps, but none of his women (supposed victims) ever complained about mistreatment. On the contrary, he took very good care of all of them and none, except Françoise Gilot, ever wanted to separate from him. So wanting to discredit a deceased artist, an artist considered the genius of the 20th century, the creator of cubism, collage, and who freed painting from the many restrictions that existed, is the most ridiculous thing, even among the many absurdities of these times. How coincidental that in no other era, neither in the 60s, nor in the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, did anyone think to say that Picasso should be side-lined because he mistreated his women. What a vile stupidity from those who strive to set the standards of this neo-puritanical and dictatorial era. They seek to impose a strict, extreme, and rigid morality. The only thing missing is to resurrect the Holy Inquisition, but this time instead of being holy, it would be feminist to impose ideological correctness and the zeal to cancel anyone who does not conform. And now even painters and artists have fallen into their censorship. Who’s next? Neandertals who were «macho men»?

GRACIAS – CHEERS

(Would truly appreciate a «Like» and a «share» as it helps with out channel)

#art, Art History In One Minute (videos): Pablo Picasso In Paris

(«Pablo No.11″/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved)

I think a lot of you missed this one and it is a good one as Pablo Picasso is one of the most important figures in Art History…

(We kindly ask you to please like, comment, share and subscribe to our channel)

CHEERS

#opinion, Pero… ¿Es que vivimos en un mundo infantil? We Live in a Childish World Now?

(«Pablo Genio»/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/Derechos Reservados)

En primer lugar vamos a colocarnos en un punto neutro, sin juzgar. Pablo Picasso nació en 1881, o sea, en el Siglo XIX, y vivió gran parte del S. XX, pues murió en 1973. ¿Entendéis? No es producto de estos tiempos gobernados por los que quieren que todo sea «correcto políticamente» o «políticamente correcto» y otras chorradas. Que era un maltratador y abusador, bueno, quizás, pero ninguna de sus mujeres (supuestas víctimas) alguna vez se quejaron de maltratos. Al contrario, a todas las mantenía muy bien y ninguna, salvo Françoise Gilot, quiso separarse jamás de él Asi que querer ahora desprestigiar a un artista muerto, a un artista considerado el genio del Siglo XX, creador del cubismo, del collage y de la pintura libre de las tantas restricciones que existían, es la cosa mas ridícula, aún entre las tantas ridiculeces de estos tiempos. Que casualidad que en ninguna otra época, ni el los 60, ni en los 70, 80, 90, 2000, a nadie se le ocurrió salir a decir que hay que echar a Picasso a un lado porque maltrato a sus mujeres. Vaya estupidez tan ruin de los que suelen marcar las pautas de esta época neo-puritana y dictatorial. Estos buscan imponer una moral estricta, extrema y rígida. Lo único que les falta es resucitar la Santa Inquisición, pero esta vez en lugar de ser santa seria feminista para impone la rectitud ideológica y el afán por cancelar al que no entre por el aro. Y ahora hasta los pintores y artistas han caído en su censura. Vaya mierda de praxis…

+++

First of all, let’s position ourselves at a neutral point, without judgment. Pablo Picasso was born in 1881, that is, in the 19th century, and lived most of the 20th century, as he died in 1973. Do you understand? He is not a product of these times governed by those who want everything to be «politically correct» or «correct politically» and other nonsense. Was he an abuser and a mistreater? Well, perhaps, but none of his women (supposed victims) ever complained about mistreatment. On the contrary, he took very good care of all of them and none, except Françoise Gilot, ever wanted to separate from him. So wanting to discredit a deceased artist, an artist considered the genius of the 20th century, the creator of cubism, collage, and who freed painting from the many restrictions that existed, is the most ridiculous thing, even among the many absurdities of these times. How coincidental that in no other era, neither in the 60s, nor in the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, did anyone think to say that Picasso should be side-lined because he mistreated his women. What a vile stupidity from those who strive to set the standards of this neo-puritanical and dictatorial era. They seek to impose a strict, extreme, and rigid morality. The only thing missing is to resurrect the Holy Inquisition, but this time instead of being holy, it would be feminist to impose ideological correctness and the zeal to cancel anyone who does not conform. And now even painters and artists have fallen into their censorship. Who’s next? Neandertals who were «macho men»?

GRACIAS – CHEERS

(Would truly appreciate a «Like» and a «share» as it helps with out channel)

¿Pedir perdón por admirar a Picasso?

(“Llora Margot”/de Francisco Bravo Cabrera/Derechos Reservados)

Pedir perdón por admirar a Picasso, en mi opinión es una reverenda idiotez y algo muy típico de estos tiempos raros. Hoy en día se quiere ser progresista, secular y tan moderno pero… son más papistas que el Papa y más puritano que los peregrinos del Mayflower.

¡Yo no pido perdón! Soy admirador de Picasso y lo seré siempre y me paso por el forro de las narices a los que se avergüenzan por admirar al pintor más grande de la pintura moderna.

Hay que ser muy ruin para juzgar a un hombre del Siglo XIX y XX con los principios del Siglo XXI. Además, ninguna de las mujeres de Picasso se quejaron.

GRACIAS

#art, JaZzArT in Colour! JaZzArT en colores!

(JaZzArT by/de Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved/Derechos Reservados)

Watercolour background for a foreground of expressionist jazzart…

Acuarela abstracta detrás de figuración expresionista y jazzista…

CHEERS – GRACIAS

#art, JaZzArT in Black & White…

(Francisco and JaZzArT/All Rights Reserved)

A drawing is a painting with less elements, said Matisse. I agree.

Visit our social media:

Instagram: @Francisco_Bravo_Cabrera

YouTube: http://www.YouTube.com/@FranciscoBravoCabrera

X: @Euskadi_Bakero

CHEERS

#art, JaZzArT in B&W part 2

(FBC at the studio/All Rights Reserved)

“The black line rules in art…” (FBC)

CHEERS

#art, JaZzArT in B&W part 3

(FBC/in Studio/All Rights Reserved)

“To express you don’t need colour.” (FBC)

CHEERS

#art, JaZzArT in Colour (part 2) – JaZzArT en colores (2a parte)

(Proto Jazz-Art by Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved/Derechos Reservados)

And colours set the mood and conquer space…

Y los colores te ilusionan y conquistan el espacio…

CHEERS – GRACIAS