JaZzArt en València

A phenomenal sculptor who also did some phenomenal painting…

Here is a good way to start getting into the work of the genius of the Renaissance…

CHEERS

This is one phenomenal artist that cannot be ignored in the history of art…

Here’s a good way to get to know her:

I sustain that cats are superior animals, meaning they are superior to dogs. And I am sorry if I upset/anger those who think dogs are the ultimate pets. But a dog just cannot compare with the intelligence, agility, usefulness and absolute brilliance of a cat. Most artists have loved cats and have had cats. Mark Twain even rented cats when he travelled then he sent money to the owners to ensure the wellbeing of his feline friends. When cats purr they send healing vibrations. They can sense danger. They can jump more than six times their height, they can see in the dark. And, as opposed to their canine friends (or enemies), they never lost the instinct to hunt and to be wild, although they repress those instincts willingly around their adopted humans…

I do not know why all those people in Europe and in America who, supposedly, hate war, only think of the war in Gaza. They complain about genocide and have been even committing crimes against Israelis in such places like Spain and the US. Yet, there are many armed conflicts going on around the world that they seem to ignore. The most important one is the war in Ukraine. I do not see huge manifestations of these peace-seeking people against the government of Putin. I do not see them manifesting against Kim Jung Un and the fact that he uses Koreans as slave labour to build his fabulous structures, especially the new beach resort. And who exactly is that beach resort in North Korea for? These lovers of Palestinians don’t seem to care for Venezuelans being driven out of their country by dictator Maduro, or Cubans, whose civil and human rights have been denied for decades by the Castro-communist regime on the island. I think these are the children of hypocrisy and I am sick and tired of having to hear the propaganda that they have manged to place in just about every news entity in the Western World.

And Picasso? Leave him alone. Now apparently some crazed out, irrational and bellicose feminists have started to label Pablo as a misogynist and an abuser, even a macho man who used women without proper respect. Well, I say that you do not judge people from other times with the standards of yours. And if he was so bad then why didn’t any of these supposed victims accuse him? On the contrary, they all loved him and he was quite generous with all of them. So piss off…

+++

Sostengo que los gatos son animales superiores, lo que significa que son superiores a los perros. Y lamento si molesto/enfado a aquellos que piensan que los perros son las mascotas definitivas. Pero un perro simplemente no puede compararse con la inteligencia, agilidad, utilidad y absoluta brillantez de un gato. La mayoría de los artistas han amado a los gatos y han tenido gatos. Mark Twain incluso alquilaba gatos cuando viajaba y luego les enviaba dinero a los dueños para asegurar el bienestar de sus amigos felinos. Cuando los gatos ronronean, envían vibraciones curativas. Pueden sentir el peligro. Pueden saltar más de seis veces su altura, pueden ver en la oscuridad. Y, a diferencia de sus amigos (o enemigos) caninos, nunca han perdido el instinto de cazar y ser salvajes, aunque reprimen esos instintos voluntariamente alrededor de sus humanos adoptados…

No sé por qué todas esas personas en Europa y América que, supuestamente, odian la guerra, solo piensan en la guerra en Gaza. Se quejan de genocidio e incluso han cometido crímenes contra israelíes en lugares como España y Estados Unidos. Sin embargo, hay muchos conflictos armados en todo el mundo que parecen ignorar. El más importante es la guerra en Ucrania. No veo grandes manifestaciones, de estas personas que buscan la paz, en contra del gobierno de Putin. No los veo manifestándose contra Kim Jong Un y el hecho de que utiliza a los coreanos como mano de obra esclava para construir sus fabulosas estructuras, especialmente el nuevo complejo turístico. ¿Y para quién exactamente es ese complejo turístico en Corea del Norte? Estos amantes de los palestinos parecen no preocuparse por los venezolanos que son desplazados de su país por el dictador Maduro, o por los cubanos, cuyos derechos civiles y humanos han sido negados durante décadas por el régimen comunista de Castro en la isla. Creo que estos son los hijos de la hipocresía y estoy cansado de tener que escuchar la propaganda que han logrado colocar en prácticamente todas las entidades informativas del mundo occidental.

Y Picasso? Mejor dejadlo tranquilo pues resulta que ahora un grupúsculo de loquillas, irracionales, o sea feministas belicosas, quiere condenar al genio del Siglo 20 y tacharlo de misógino, de machista y de abusador. Escuchad bien antes de contar por ahí esas chorradas y dejad de juzgar a la gente de otra época por los estándares de esta. Además, Pablito no pudo haber sido tan malo porque ninguna de sus mujeres lo acuso y él, en cambio, era muy generoso con ellas todas. Asi que no vengáis aqui a cortar el bacalao y mejor iros a freír espárragos…

El tío Cucufato siempre sabe lo que ponerse…

Uncle Cucufato always dresses for success

CHEERS

DON’T MISS US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Instagram: @Francisco_Bravo_Cabrera

YouTube: www.YouTube.com/@FranciscoBravoCabrera

X: @Euskadi_Bakero

Artist Representative: «By Guloshka»

E-Mail: guloshka404@gmail.com

Instagram: @guloshka

Well, Lao Tzu might not have said it exactly as in the translation above, but he did say that an excellent soldier is not a furious man. This could also mean that the «accomplished person is not an aggressive person». In any event it means that one must not confuse anger and violent tendencies from the work that one does, even if that work is the work and the duty of the soldier. I was glad to have learned that (as I did study the Tao) early in life before joining the military…

So I thought we could talk a bit about Lao Tzu and the Tao Te Ching…

Lao Tzu, although I believe he was real, is thought of as a semi-legendary Chinese philosopher believed to have lived in the 6th century B.C. (of course some «experts» place him later). He is traditionally regarded as the founder of Taoism (Daoism) and the author of its foundational text, the Tao Te Ching. His name is also a title which means «Old Master,» and much of his life remains shrouded in myth. Legend says he was an archivist in the imperial court and when he retired and left China a border guard asked him to to write down his wisdom. His wisdom became the Tao Te Ching.

Tao Te Ching means The Book of the Way and Its Virtue which is composed of short, poetic texts that explore the nature of the Tao, which is The Way, the fundamental, and ineffable force that underlies all existence. It emphasizes themes such as:

Non-action (wu wei): acting in harmony with the natural flow rather than through force or struggle

Simplicity and humility: embracing a quiet, modest life

Balance and duality: recognizing the interplay of opposites (yin and yang)

Inner wisdom: valuing intuitive understanding over rigid logic or ambition

The Tao Te Ching has had a profound influence on Chinese philosophy, religion, politics, and art. It is a cornerstone of philosophical Taoism, and its teachings also shaped Chinese Buddhism, Confucianism, and various martial and meditative traditions.

Both Lao Tzu and the Tao Te Ching continue to inspire people around the world seeking a life of balance, peace, and alignment with nature.

CHEERS

LOOK FOR US IN OUR SOCIAL MEDIA

YouTube: www.YouTube.com/@FranciscoBravoCabrera

Instagram: @Francisco_Bravo_Cabrera

X: @Euskadi_Bakero

Artist Representative: «By Guloshka»

E-Mail: guloshka404@gmail.com

Instagram: @guloshka

“Keep your eyes wide open, like a judge that never sleeps.” (Francisco Bravo Cabrera)

Andy Warhol (Pittsburgh, PA 1928-1987) supposedly a leading figure in Pop Art. But I’ve some serious criticisms and I can explain them and support my view that he is unimportant in art history.

Shallow or Commercial: Warhol’s repetition of mass-produced images (Campbell’s Soup cans, Marilyn Monroe) are empty and purely commercial. It is banal, lacks depth and relies…totally…on shock or novelty.

Factory Production: The only way he could mass produce was through the use of employees, operators in his studio called “The Factory”. There is as much authenticity to his work as there is in the Chinese trinquetes sold on Canal Street in Manhattan. Is that what it means to be an “artist”? I would reduce his art to branding.

Cultural Critique or Capitalist Embrace?: While some see Warhol as satirizing consumer culture, I think he wasn’t critiquing it at all. He was profiting from it. That ambiguity makes his legacy controversial.

So Why Are They Still Considered Important?

Despite these critiques, «experts» (good grief!) still think that both of these artists made significant contributions. Kahlo brought…in a very mediocre way…Mexican culture and what some think are feminist themes into the global art narrative in a deeply personal way.

Warhol, they think, redefined art in the 20th century by…supposedly…blurring the lines between commercialism and fine art. Experts and fans think he was challenging the art world’s elitism.

Personally I don’t subscribe to any of these justifications. Everyone knows my views on «experts» and I know that the art world/art business moves on what sells and what the big boys…dealers/collectors/gallerists…can sell to the new art collectors that cannot purchase the classical art that now is unavailable.

What do you think?

CHEERS

Frida Kahlo (Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico 1907-1954) is widely respected for her deeply personal and symbolic self-portraits, but I do not believe it and I can argue my point that she is not a valuable addition to art history with critical perspectives on her legacy:

Limited Formal Innovation: Her technique was not particularly ground-breaking…far from it…in terms of formal or technical development. Her style was rooted in Mexican folk art and a sort of surrealism-light that did not innovate in terms of form, compared to…dare I…contemporaries like Picasso or Kandinsky, which were real artists in every sense of the word. For me Picasso and Kandinsky were the greatest innovators of the 20th Century and true geniuses. Kahlo does not fit in that company.

Overemphasis on Personal Suffering: Her fame leans too heavily on her personal story—her chronic pain, relationship with Diego Rivera, and her political identity—rather than on the artistic merit of her works themselves. And of course, she was a martyr and martyrs sell and are well accepted by the general public.

Cult of Personality: Her image (iconic unibrow, flower crown, traditional Tehuana dress) has become commodified to the point that she’s more famous for being Frida Kahlo the icon than Frida Kahlo the painter. She…and this was through no fault of her…became the queen of merchandising. I mean even little girls for Halloween dress up like Frida Kahlo. And pop stars, beginning with Madonna, have also dressed like her to capitalise on the image. But that says nothing about artistic significance…