(Jazz in B Flat Minor, by FBC, image property of FBC, Omnia Caelum Studios Valencia. All Rights Reserved)
This one is really full of colours, almost an abstract but quite figurative indeed. So I decided it will make a good fine art print and it is available here at Fine Art America.
But there are many more works that may or may not make available as prints. Check them out here:
(JaZzArT drawing by Francisco Bravo Cabrera/property of FBC/Omnia Caelum Studios Valencia/All Rights Reserved)
I love to teach, (seen my video series on Art History? No? Follow the link, (there’s another one below), but there are some things that I just won’t teach to artists, or students, or art lovers, and that is how to draw. To learn to draw you have to take classes specifically geared at getting you acquainted with the different forms of graphite (pencils), charcoal, Conté Crayons, pastels etcetera etcetera. Then you learn to «see» and to «look» at your subject. Classes are good because they usually have models and I cannot do that from this blog…
But I will say that there are a few things that I can reach out and teach from this vantage point of mine, i.d. my blog, and that is I can try to guide you to think as an «artist» (whatever that is). First, there has to be an incredible urge to express, to reach out, to talk to someone out there, or to everyone. Musicians do that, and of course, their method (song, musical piece) is much more immediate, but we can do that with our art as well, now much easier thanks to the Internet.
Second, you have to know how to dominate and master your craft. That comes only with practice and time. And intimately tied to that is the development of talent. Talent is not something magical that is given to some and denied to others. Talent is a muscle that is developed through hard work. The more you draw the better you get, the more talented you get. Ever heard of «practise makes perfect»?
Don’t worry too much about creativity, imagination, originality or other such terms used by many to talk about art. Art does not depend upon creativity or on the artist’s imagination. And originality? What is that? Is there anything that has not been done before? Originality is not important. What is important is how you approach your subject matter and how you bring it to life on the canvas or the paper or with clay, bronze or even gold.
Art is created by the artist as a discipline, as a job well learned and well developed. It does not flow intuitively, like a child would do. And yes, intuitive art exists but it should exist solely as an experiment, or an exercise. But mainly as a way to get to a real work of art, which is something contrived and controlled, from beginning to end, by the will of the artist.
Here are some examples of some of the drawings I have been working on lately. Notice the line, and notice the development of the composition and how, after you know where your drawing is going, shadows are created, lines are reinforced or removed, altered, changed, in other words, turning the sketch into a finished work. And, of course, these are exercises, they are meant to be a finished work, but not something other than that, being a fully developed idea.
(Images property of FBC, Omnia Caelum Studios Valencia. All Rights Reserved)
I will leave behind one of the Art History videos that I have been doing and from that one you can find in my channel many more.
(«Lux»/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved)
AND LET US NOW TALK ABOUT «BAD» ARTISTS (in my opinion)
This is simply my subjective opinion, although I will support it with some facts as I have been able to discover them.
I have to start with Jeff Koons. To me he is not an artist, but a businessman that has capitalised on thinking himself an artist and creating works that, well, you know them, and if you don’t, you will have to look them up because they are too hideous to be placed in this post. The official data on him from “experts” is: Koons is criticized for being more of a brand than an artist, outsourcing most of his work to assistants. Well the experts here are right, although they could have said more.
Moving right along we have Damien Hirst, and the experts say: Some see his work (like the diamond-encrusted skull or preserved animals) as shock value over substance. Here is another artist that employs lots of assistants to do his work. With these experts I do agree.
Damien Hirst created a series of what he called “Spot Paintings” (actually it was done by his assistants, mostly) and then British Airways budget arm Go used a design of multiple coloured spots to the tagline “Go, the new low-cost airline from British Airways.” (The Independent). Hirst stated that the advertisement “bears a striking resemblance” to his own “spot paintings” series. (The Independent). He actually tried to sue the airline but the case never progressed. I mean, hasn’t he ever seen the flamenco dresses of the women at Sevilla’s April Fair? Good grief!
(Image: GlobArtMag)
Then we have Thomas Kinkade, and what do the art experts say: Kinkade is hugely popular for his glowing cottage paintings, but widely dismissed by critics as overly sentimental “mall art.” And about this Californian I’ve nothing to say except that he was a trained and technically sound artist but his style and his art is not something I spend much time on. And this is another case in which I agree with the “experts.”
(Image: Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain)
Some other things that art history talks about are artists that are famous but are, or were, “bad” people. Let’s check out these three that can be thought of as being ethically or personally controversial:
• Caravaggio – literally murdered someone. • Wagner – (in music) was notoriously anti-Semitic. • Picasso – was brilliant but also famously cruel to women. (although none of the supposed “victims” ever complained and he supported them all generously)
Of course the «list» does not stop there, but this post does, so look for part 2 coming soon.
(Image property of FBC, Omnia Caelum Studios Valencia. All Rights Reserved)
This ink on Cansol paper I did in 2013, still experimenting with the creation of Jazz Art, and it is symbolic of a jazz group jamming away. Rhythms start and flow, grow and diminish in their musical dynamics but the beat, an essential element of jazz still continues…
This, together with some other, very special items, I have made available through Pixels and you can access them here so take a look…
And here is a short video of some of my other work…
This is something new I decided to do several months ago. Until then I have always sold my paintings and drawings to collectors and art lovers as unique and original items. Now I will try this new approach as I have been asked many times if my artwork is available as prints. Well, now some of it is available.
I have selected some of my illustrations and even some of my colour work to be available as fine art prints through Pixels and you can see them here.
Hoping you like it I leave you with this video of some more of my work at Omnia Caelum Studios (Miami) and Valencia:
A truly hard working, prolific artist. In 1973 there were about 45,000 unsold works in his estate. The catalogue raisonné compiled by Christian Zervos, lists more than 16,000 paintings and drawings in total for the artist. And he painted them all himself, he did not use workers hired to finish what he started or simply touched up, like so many modern artists nowadays do.
(The 15 metre sculpture he designed and donated to the City of Chicago)
I truly would advice any art lover, art collector and especially art students and emerging artists, to look further, to read biographies of artists and to search, experiment, and work, hard, real hard. That is the only way to develop talent.