#art, Talking About Art, Chapter 4

(Francisco Bravo Cabrera/actor portrayal/All Rights Reserved)

It seems to me that when artists are asked to speak about art they usually go into their artist «character» and begin to talk about art as something almost esoteric, or religious. It would almost seem as if they are making the artists as being the new priests of the creative world. I don’t buy it.

Sometimes art lovers, non-artists, also begin to define art as something that is beyond the means and the reach of «ordinary» folk. I have heard people say that artists are born like that, with that «gift» or «ability» with statements such as «Van Gogh had so much talent». Good grief! Is being an artist now a genetic condition? Is talent a genetic trait? As far as I know Mendel did not name it as one.

Art is nothing like that at all, in my opinion. Artists are as ordinary as anybody else. Art is a profession, and a craft, like being a plumber or a neurosurgeon. One likes art, one is inclined, (is that the «gift»?), one first gets into it in High School. Then one enrols in college and takes art courses. Finally one majors in Fine Arts and graduates from University. Then one begins a professional life as an artist with one goal in mind, to make as much money as possible.

That is all there is to art. Actually the great Renaissance masters never thought of themselves as artists. They considered themselves as skilled craftsmen. And when a client came to their studios, they would show them samples of their craft. Usually they were small portraits, as portraits were the paintings commonly commissioned from them. Then they would negotiate a price and offer different plans like the good plan, the most expensive one being that the master artist paints the entire portrait. A second option would be that the portrait is partially painted by the master and the rest by the other artists operating in the studio. And the cheapest option would be a portrait painted entirely by the studio assistants. That is how the «art world» functioned in the old days.

But believe me, no one is born with a gift for art, or for the piano or for the ballet stage. One trains, rehearses, and one practices tirelessly. One realises that practice makes perfect so one practices all day, every day. The more one works the more one develops talent. And that is another issue that is greatly misunderstood by many. No one is born with talent. I cannot stress that enough. Talent is something that is developed, like muscles. One trains, one gets stronger and the body begins to show muscle development. The same thing with artistic talent. The more you paint the better you get. The more you play the tuba the better you get. In other words, the more talent you develop.

So, as an artist, I am asked all the time about the process of art and my reply is always, more or less, the same. Art is a profession. Not everyone is an artist, and not every one can make art of the same quality. Let us say that we all have the potential, but not all have the will, the drive or the desire to be an artist. And no, your five year old who just drew a «beautiful» picture of your family that you proudly hang in the refrigerator, they are not an artist. They might want to be, some day. I mean would you say just because that same five year old built a lego structure that they are an engineer?

And please do not misunderstand. I am not saying that every artist must go the academic route and graduate from uni. An artist can train at a private academy, or at any type of school. Or they can train themselves through books, videos (nowadays videos are the new books and there are many), or with other artists. But remember, no one teaches themselves, we all learn from someone or some thing. So if you have the inclination, go for it!

CHEERS

#art, Pintando desde dentro – Painting From the Inside…

(Imagen propiedad de Francisco Bravo Cabrera/Derechos Reservados/Image property of Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved)

No es lo que se ve, o lo que está delante del artista lo que pinta el artista expresionista. No importan los colores auténticos del sujeto. No importa por donde viene o va la luz, ni la perspectiva clásica. Lo único que importa es lo que está dentro del pintor; eso es lo que va a plasmar sobre la tela. El arte del pintor expresionista no tiene mucho que ver con la realidad objetiva, si no con lo que piensa el pintor de ella. Tampoco tiene mucho, o nada que ver con la realidad. O sea, la realidad como la ven los demás. El pintor expresionista crea su propia realidad. Que carajo, no importa el raciocinio ni la lógica! Lo único que importa es plasmar sobre la tela lo que el pintor ve desde dentro y la emoción que busca transmitir.

+++

It is not what is visible, or what is in front of him that the expressionist artist paints. The true colours of the subject do not matter. It doesn’t matter where the light comes from or goes, nor classical perspective. The only thing that matters is what is inside the painter; that is what he will transcribe onto the canvas. The art of the expressionist painter is not closely related to objective reality, but rather to what the painter thinks of it. It also has little, or nothing, to do with reality as others see it. The expressionist painter creates his own reality. Frankly, reasoning and logic do not matter! The only thing that matters is to capture on the canvas what the painter sees from within and the emotion he seeks to convey.

(«Bass & Dancer»/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/Derechos Reservados/All rights Reserved)

GRACIAS – CHEERS

#art, Arte jazz surrealista – Surreal Jazz Art? (Bodo Vespaciano)

(Bodo Vespaciano/Actor portrayal/All Rights Reserved/Bodo Vespaciano representado por un actor/Derechos Reservados)

El surrealismo es algo surreal, como el expresionismo es algo que sale de la mente, no tiene que tener nada que ver con la realidad, lo pilla a uno durmiendo, andando, trabajando o simplemente pensando en como son las cosas o en como deben ser, menudo esfuerzo, ¿No?

+++

I think surrealism is something surreal, like expressionism that comes out of the mind and has nothing to do with reality. It grabs you while you sleep, or while you’re strolling, working, or simply thinking on how things are and how they should be. Takes a little effort, no?

GRACIAS – CHEERS

#art, #video, Bodo Vespaciano’s Art Digital 2025

(«Blood Red Abstract Lines»/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved)

Art Digital is digital art created through many digital, computerised means but always touched by the hand of the artist.

Look for me on Instagram: @Francisco_Bravo_Cabrera and @Guloshka (artist rep)

(Please do not forget to like, comment and share)

CHEERS

#art, What is Art, part 2: «The Painter»…

(Jean Baptiste Chardin)

The painter… Now it is the «artist»…

Back in the time of the great Renaissance masters, painters like Michelangelo, Botticelli, Leonardo and the rest of the gang, did not call themselves artists. They thought of themselves as trained artisans. Highly skilled craftsmen that had studied and mastered the craft of painting. And paintings also were not regarded as art. During those times artists did not walk into their studios, picked up a canvas and thought of what they were going to paint on it. In those times painters painted what was commissioned from them. Their greatest patrons were the Church and the nobility, along with some rich merchants as well. They did not choose their topics, they were told what to paint.

Of course that sounds quite unlike our modern concept of art. We think of an artist as someone who creates. And his creations come from so deep within his knowledge, his creativity, his innermost mind that some might even believe it came from his very profound, immortal soul. I call bollocks on that one…

Art is still a business. Paintings are mostly for decorative purposes. And artists should still be trained, skilled and dedicated professionals with good taste and a rounded off and complete education. Art does not necessarily have to be that esoteric, mystical form of expression that rises from the spirit to convey a transcendental message of intense and extraordinary beauty and importance. Art is the result of the work of a craftsman who paints/sculpts (etcetera) in his quest to make a living. In other words a painter/artist works for money, just like Michelangelo and Leonardo did.

There is nothing mystical or phenomenal in the work of the artist. Art has many functions and they are all in need of art and the artist is in need of making a living. Art is not done for the love of art. An artist is not a romantic dreamer standing in front of a muse who directs him to paint an extraordinary work called a masterpiece. No, an artist gets up, and using only his well-learned disciplinary habits, enters his studio and begins to work. He does not have to be original as there is nothing original under the sun. An artist only has to be true to himself in the knowledge that he is creating something using his learned abilities and guided by his good taste.

Stay tuned for part 3 coming soon and I will continue with these chapters if you let me know, in the comments below, that you are interested and want to participate in this dialogue.

(2012/Please do not forget to «like» and thank you)

CHEERS

#art, Drawings from Bodoland (My head)…

(«Flauta-Man»/graphite on paper/Francisco Bravo Cabrera/All Rights Reserved)

Drawing is something that I love. As an artist some of my greatest moments came while drawing and some of my greatest successes have been with and due to drawings. In all the years that I have been in this profession, the years I spent drawing, and I mean only drawing, were some of my most fructiferous and exiting. I stopped painting in 2008 and took up the pencils and the pens, replaced the canvas for artists paper and began to develop my skills as an illustrator. My peak year was 2017, but by 2016 I had started painting once more… Here are a few of the drawings from that period. They are all from Omnia Caelum Studios Miami and done in my studios overlooking the Atlantic Ocean in Miami Beach…

I am happy to say that the majority of the drawings, (all originals, no prints), especially from 2017, now hang in private collections throughout the world.

CHEERS

#artvideo, Mujeres en el arte, las grandes artistas olvidadas – Women in Art, the Great Artists Forgotten

(Fernande Olivier)

Si, fue la primera mujer de Picasso en Paris, pero era una artista y aunque aprendió mucho de Pablo, tenia el temperamento y el deseo de crear. No se le debe recordar solo como una de las mujeres de Picasso, sino por su arte.

+++

Yes, she was Picasso’s first love (and woman) in Paris, but she was an artist and although she may have learned much from Picasso, she had the artistic temperament and the will to create. She should not be remembered only as one of Picasso’s women, but instead for her art.

(Si te ha gustado por favor dale el «like», gracias/If you liked it please give it a «like», thank you)

Gracias…

Cheers…